Urban reliefs

Model of the city of Zurich (Switzerland)
Model of the city of Zurich (Switzerland) 1:1,000 covering an area of about 100 m2,
City of Zurich, Hochbaudepartement

Not only terrain can be miniaturized, but also single constructions like buildings. Very early, such models were already used in the Ancient Greek and in the Roman Empire. They were used both to study planned works and to illustrate existing buildings. For example, a model of a cathedral could be used as controlling instance for the stonemasons when repairing the building or altering it [1].

For strategic purposes, several separate building models were not suitable, so the whole city and its surroundings had to be modelled. Thus, the first terrain models were born.

In contrast to many other terrain models, the buildings and their man-made environs are constitutive for these models. Today they are often used for planning purposes. On a model, it is easy to depict the influence of a planned project to the existing environment. When presenting projects to the public, a model is the most convenient instrument.

Old city models have an eminent value for historic research. Unlike more or less unaffected landscape they underlie much faster changes during time. Sometimes, models depicting a historic period are made later, using old city maps as a construction base.

Zurich at 1800
Zurich at 1800
Zurich at 1800

The underlying terrain is often formed using the layer method. The buildings are made from wood or plaster, but a lot of other materials may be suitable. Nowadays, most urban models have been generated using computer based techniques. A result is shown in the figure below.


3D printed model of the old town of Aarau, Switzerland (2013) derived from swisstopo data: Topographic Landscape Model (TLM), swissBUILDINGS3D, swissALTI3D, scale 1:2,000. Printed by swisstopo in cooperation with GIS-Zentrum Stadt Zürich.

[1] The first paragraph bases on Heydenreich, Ludwig Heinrich. Architekturmodell. In: Schmitt, Otto (ed.). Reallexikon zur deutschen Kunstgeschichte. Band 1. Stuttgart 1937. col.918-940.